« Home | Previous: Pursue Revised Illiana Plan Says Post-Tribune »
| Previous: Rose Blogs Her Anti-Illiana Position On Myspace »
| Previous: CAPIT Reports No April 4th Illiana Expressway Hear... »
| Previous: Tully Critiques Governor's Illiana East Leg Defeat... »
| Previous: Casson's View: Rural Folks Stay Off Suburban Roads... »
| Previous: Does Mitch Daniels' New Illiana Plan Help His Reel... »
| Previous: 'We No Longer Want To Be The Silent Majority' »
| Previous: I-94 Plans Seek Mexico To Canada Superhighway »
| Previous: INDOT Illiana Web Site Down »
| Previous: Highland Democrat To Porter Co.: No Illiana Money ... »

Thursday, March 29, 2007

CAPIT Teams Up With Pro-Transit Groups, But Doesn't Support 1% Tax

Citizens Against the Privatized Illiana Toll Road has teamed up with transit supporters, but remains neutral on a 1% food and beverage tax to pay for the public transit services, reports the Northwest Indiana Times.

A group opposing the proposed Illiana Expressway is has agreed to team up with the Interfaith Federation and Save the Dunes Council to support what they are calling smart growth across the Region.

Citizens Against Privatized Illiana Toll Road also is distancing itself from a claim that it supports a 1 percent food and beverage tax to support regional busing.

Dave Ahlberg, president of Citizens Against Privatized Illiana Toll Road, said the inaccurate claim was the result of a misunderstanding that arose when his group agreed to team up with the Interfaith Federation and Save the Dunes Council.

CAPIT is neutral on the proposed tax, he said. But the group does share the coalition's opposition to the Illiana Expressway project and the call for alternative forms of transportation.

"We're just a group of like-minded people in some areas," Ahlberg said.

CAPIT's support for the tax was included in a press release announcing a press conference today on the new coalition.
CAPIT's neutral tax position makes sense because it has often been argued that rural areas end up subsidizing urban mass transit without any corresponding benefits for those taxpayers.

It would be interesting if a rural mass transit system could be developed that would be self-supporting, that wouldn't encourage sprawl (a NIRPC document shows some complain a Lowell South Shore Line might cause sprawl), and would be able to meet the needs of people in areas less densely populated than urban and suburban areas. But, it is likely that any such system would require heavy taxpayer subsidies to be able to operate.


Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Greatest Hits | Illiana Expressway News:

  • New Anti Illiana Expressway Coalition Forms
  • Illiana Expressway Toll Road Study Area Map
  • Gov. Mitch Daniels Drops
    Plans to Extend The Illiana East Of I-65.
  • I-80/I-94 Part Of Mexico-Canada Superhighway
  • Illiana Makes Fed's 'Corridors' List"
  • 0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    Links to this post:

    Create a Link

    << Home