Scientists predict bad things for Lake Michigan if temperatures in Chicago and Northwest Indiana continue to rise.

A report predicts in 2050 that rising temperatures could cause Lake Michigan’s water levels to plummet because of evaporation and diversion.

That concerns scientists behind a new report: “Climate Change and Great Lakes Water Resources.” The report predicts lake levels may drop by as much as 4.5 feet by 2050 as a result of less precipitation and more evaporation.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Mixx
  • Propeller
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • blogmarks
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Live
  • SphereIt

Technorati Tags: , , ,

  • Still Discharging Into Lake Michigan
    Less pollutants are going into Lake Michigan than in the past, but millions of pounds are still making their way...
  • Lake Michigan Is The New Kennebunkport
    Shore Magazine’s election wrap-up email arrived in my inbox with an interesting tid-bit of information that bodes well for Lake...
  • NWI was just like Arizona back before the climate changed
    The Northwest Indiana Times runs a story today about a Valparaiso University professor’s research into the history of Northwest Indiana’s...
  • Global Warming Means Defense Build Up
    Prediction: The threat of global warming will require the build up of America’s defenses if we are to protect ourselves...
  • Chicago Air & Water Show
    This is the weekend for the Chicago Air and Water Show. Here’s some video of what to expect at the...


  • Comments

    4 Responses to “Will Climate Change Drain Lake Michigan?”

    1. Buzzcut on November 30th, 2007 10:10 am

      Screw Lake Michigan. I’ll sacrifice it for a winter that is 8 degrees warmer!

      I’m skeptical of parts of the global warming thesis, but it is undeniable that our winters are already a lot warmer than they used to be. Tom Skilling had a graph last week showing that November and December temps in Chicago are like 4 degrees warmer than in the recent past. You can’t argue with data like that.

      Warmer is better, as far as I’m concerned. It means less heating of our houses, better gas mileage for our cars, no need for snowblowers, etc. If I can avoid those insane gas bills in January and February, my bottom line is going to be a lot healthier.

    2. Chris on November 30th, 2007 10:49 am

      I’m inclined to think that Lake Michigan is more threatened by diversion of water away from the lake to other places that don’t put the water back into the lake, than by the threat of global warming.

      Global warming seems to be a tool designed to motivate people to perform actions that make money for other people. (Shifting manufacturing from the first world to the third world is one example of “solving” the global warming problem. Or, creating new carbon credit exchanges.)

    3. Buzzcut on November 30th, 2007 11:35 am

      Chris, while diversion is an issue, it pales in comparison to evaporation.

      The report in question is correct in linking warmer winters to less lake ice to more evaporation to lower lake levels. All else being equal, of course (which is quite an assumption, and perhaps not a good one)

      My point is that to get ice on Lake Michigan, you need brutally cold weather. If global warming reduces cold weather, I’m all for it, no matter what it does to the lake!

    4. Chris on November 30th, 2007 11:55 am

      Hi Buzz,

      I’m in favor of milder weather also.

      Things will all balance out in the end and we’ll adapt and adjust. If people can live in deserts all over the world, we’ll figure out ways of adapting to warmer (and cooler) periods in our history.

    Leave a Reply




    Indiana Top Sites -- Indiana's Best Websites Vote for Us on Top Sites of America Web Sites List!
    Blog Flux Directory Local Blogs - Blog Top Sites NWI Blogger